Tithi Ange Satya Ane Samadhan Part 2 - Book Summary

Here's a comprehensive summary of the Jain text "Tithi Ange Satya ane Samadhan Part 2" by Abhayshekharsuri:

This book is the second part of a series addressing controversies surrounding the observance of specific Jain dates (tithis). The author, Acharya Vimal Suri Abhayshekharsuri, aims to clarify and resolve disputes, primarily focusing on the "two-tithi" (navo paksha) perspective which he believes deviates from scriptural principles.

Core Argument and Author's Stance:

The central theme of the book revolves around the author's firm belief in adhering to bhava-satya (essential truth or spirit) of Jain teachings, which he argues is best preserved by the unified observance of specific dates by the entire Jain congregation (Shri Sangh). He criticizes a "new sect" or "new party" (navo paksha) for promoting differing interpretations of tithis, leading to division within the community.

Key Points and Debates:

The Meaning of Shastra-Mati (Scriptural Authority): The author begins by dissecting the concept of "Shastra-Mati." He argues that it is not merely the literal scriptural verses (which are physical) but the meaning and understanding derived from them by accomplished scholars (gitarthas) that holds true authority. He criticizes the "new sect's" implied reliance on modern legal interpretations (like court judges) over the wisdom of these gitarthas. He emphasizes that in cases of differing interpretations among gitarthas, the majority opinion should prevail, mirroring legal precedents.
Critique of the "Jignasa ane Truti" Section: The author addresses a critique published in the magazine "Jinvaani" in its "Jignasa ane Truti" section regarding his previous work. He questions the anonymity of the contributors, suggesting it indicates a lack of confidence in their scriptural knowledge or a fear of public scrutiny. He posits that if the authors were truly learned gitarthas, they wouldn't hide their identities.
The "Nevo Paksha" and Division: The author strongly criticizes the "new sect" for their role in creating discord within the Jain community. He points to incidents in various cities (Matunga, Vadodara, Ahmedabad, etc.) where legal disputes arose due to differing opinions on tithis. He suggests that the "new sect" actively tries to create division, citing a letter from the Pindwada Jain Sangh as evidence of their divisive tactics.
The Pindwada Jain Sangh Letter: This letter, addressed to a respected Acharya, details how a particular sect (implied to be the "new sect") attempted to disrupt the Chaturmas (monsoon retreat) arrangements in Pindwada. The letter accuses them of spreading false propaganda, instigating conflict, and disrespecting the established Sangh (congregation) by sending their monks without invitation, thereby creating division. The Sangh resolved to withhold respect and hold the offending monks responsible for any unrest.
Misrepresentation and False Accusations: The author addresses accusations made against him by the "new sect," such as claiming he advocates for abandoning scriptural adherence for the sake of unity or that he misrepresents his own arguments. He refutes these claims by emphasizing his reliance on scriptural references and the intent to uphold the bhava-satya.
The "One Day of Observance" Principle: The author reiterates his belief that unified observance of a specific date by the entire Sangh is a crucial aspect of bhava-satya. He argues that this unity prevents dissension and fosters spiritual harmony. He challenges the "new sect" to provide any scriptural or purvacharya (ancient preceptors) reference that supports separate observances leading to discord.
Panchang (Jain Almanac) Disputes: A significant portion of the book is dedicated to refuting claims made by the "new sect" regarding the Jain Almanac (Panchang).
- Misrepresentation of the Author's Stance on Panchang: The author clarifies that he never advocated for creating an entirely new, independent Jain almanac. His suggestion was merely to adjust local Panchangs for specific observances like Navkarshi or Pachakhan based on local sunrise times, not to alter the entire almanac's foundation.
- Critique of "Two-faced Policy": The author strongly condemns the "new sect's" practice of using different criteria for Aradhana (religious observance) and Muhurta (auspicious timings). He highlights that while they might observe a tithi on a different day for Aradhana if it's diminished (kshay), they still adhere to the correct Muhurta based on the actual tithi. He argues this inconsistency reveals a "two-faced policy" and a desire to prioritize Muhurta over Aradhana, which he finds contradictory to scriptural teachings. He provides detailed examples to illustrate this point, contrasting the practice of different sects and locations.
- The Role of the Sangh in Changes: He emphasizes that any changes to traditional practices or the almanac should be a collective decision of the entire Sangh, not an individual's prerogative. He cites statements from esteemed purvacharyas who stressed the importance of the Sangh's collective will.
- Historical Panchang Adjustments: The author discusses historical instances of almanac adjustments, notably those made by revered Acharyas like Shri Prem Suri Maharaj, who themselves acknowledged errors and sought forgiveness for deviating from established practices without the Sangh's consent.
Defense Against Accusations of Misleading or Misrepresenting: The author repeatedly defends himself against accusations of misrepresentation, such as attributing statements to him that he never made or twisting his arguments. He challenges his critics to cite specific pages or quotes to substantiate their claims. He believes such tactics are born out of a desire to discredit him and his followers.
The Importance of Bhava-Satya and Unity: Throughout the book, the author consistently emphasizes that the ultimate goal is to preserve the bhava-satya and foster unity within the Jain community. He believes that adhering to the scriptural principles regarding tithis, as understood and practiced by the majority of learned scholars and the collective Sangh, is the path to achieving this.
A Call for Honest Dialogue and Scriptural Adherence: The author concludes by urging for honest and scripturally-grounded discussions. He states that he will only engage with further literature if it demonstrates genuine scriptural knowledge and a sincere effort to resolve the tithi disputes based on the guidance of purvacharyas. He expresses a hope for constructive dialogue that benefits the Jain community and upholds the sanctity of the scriptures.

In essence, "Tithi Ange Satya ane Samadhan Part 2" is a passionate defense of traditional Jain practices concerning tithis, a critique of what the author perceives as divisive interpretations by a dissenting group, and a strong advocacy for scriptural authority, unity, and the principle of bhava-satya within the Jain fold.