Tattvatrai Mimansa Part 1 And 2

Here's a comprehensive summary of the Jain text "Tattvatrai Mimansa Part 1 and 2" by Amarvijay, based on the provided pages:

Overall Purpose and Scope:

"Tattvatrai Mimansa" (An Inquiry into the Three Realities) by Muni Amarvijay is a significant Jain text that aims to present a comparative analysis of Jain beliefs and practices against Vedic (Hindu) traditions. The work is extensive, spanning approximately 1200 pages and divided into two volumes. Its core objective is to illuminate the principles of Jainism by contrasting them with Vedic viewpoints, thereby providing readers, particularly the Jain community, with profound knowledge. The text emphasizes a middle path and comparative understanding.

Author and Lineage:

The author, Muni Amarvijay, is a disciple of the esteemed Jain Acharya Shrimad Vijayanand Surishwarji, also known as Shrimad Atmaramji Maharaj. This lineage highlights the traditional and scholarly background of the author.

Key Themes and Content (as suggested by the introductory and preview pages):

The provided pages offer a glimpse into the foundational aspects and the ambitious scope of the "Tattvatrai Mimansa." While the bulk of the text is not available, the introductory materials and chapter titles reveal the following:

• Comparative Theology: A central theme is the comparison of Jainism with Vedic traditions. The author intends to analyze concepts like the nature of the universe, the forms of deities, the role of gurus, and the essence of their respective religions.
• Critique of Puranic Narratives: A substantial portion of the provided text, particularly the latter pages and the table of contents, delves into a detailed critique of Puranic and Vedic accounts of creation, deities (Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva), and historical figures. The author meticulously points out perceived contradictions, mythological inconsistencies, and potential interpolations within these narratives, often contrasting them with Jain philosophical tenets.
• Jain Cosmology and History: The text outlines the Jain cosmological view of the universe, including the cyclical nature of time (Avsarpini and Utsarpini kal) and the gradual decline and rise of conditions and beings. It also touches upon the lineage of Jain Tirthankaras, such as Rishabhdev, and the concept of Shalakapurushas (illustrious beings).
• Philosophical Disputation: The author engages with various philosophical schools and their interpretations, particularly those found in Vedic literature. There's a strong emphasis on contrasting these with what the author considers the pure and unchanging essence of Jainism.
• Historical Analysis: The text appears to be rooted in a deep study of historical texts, both Jain and Vedic. The author frequently cites Puranic scriptures, Upanishads, and even references the comparative analysis of Western scholars like Professor Hermann Jacobi to support or critique points.
• Emphasis on Truth and Purity: Despite the comparative nature, the underlying message promotes the pursuit of truth and adherence to pure spiritual principles, aligning with Jain ideals.
• Author's Motivation: The preface suggests that the impetus for writing this book arose from interactions with the Jain community, particularly villagers, who were seeking clarity amidst conflicting interpretations of Dharma presented by Brahmins. Muni Amarvijayji felt compelled to provide a clear and accurate understanding of Jain principles.
• The "Tattvatrai": While not explicitly defined in the preview, the title "Tattvatrai Mimansa" suggests a focus on three fundamental realities or principles within Jain philosophy, which are then examined and compared with other traditions.

Key Criticisms and Comparisons with Vedic/Puranic Traditions:

The provided pages are heavily focused on the author's critical examination of Vedic and Puranic narratives, highlighting:

• Creation Myths: The author scrutinizes multiple conflicting accounts of creation found in Vedic and Puranic literature, questioning the logic and consistency of these narratives.
• Deities' Nature and Actions: The text extensively analyzes the portrayal of deities like Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, pointing out what the author considers human-like flaws, contradictions, and mythological inconsistencies (e.g., incestuous desires, irrational actions, power struggles). The author implicitly or explicitly contrasts these with the pure and omniscient nature of Jain Tirthankaras.
• Historical Accuracy: The author questions the historical accuracy and chronological consistency of Puranic accounts, suggesting that many narratives might be later interpolations or influenced by other traditions (like Buddhism) to suit specific agendas.
• Yajnas and Rituals: The text seems to critique the emphasis on animal sacrifice and other rituals in Vedic traditions, which is diametrically opposed to the Jain principle of Ahimsa (non-violence).
• The Concept of "Avatars": The author questions the Jain view of Tirthankaras versus the Vedic concept of Vishnu's avatars, suggesting that many avatara stories, especially those involving human-like frailties or contradictions, are likely later fabrications.
• The Use of "Hans" and "Varaah": The text implies a connection between Jain Tirthankaras and the concept of the cosmic Purusha or Hiranyagarbha, suggesting that the Vedic understanding might be a derivative or altered version.

Methodology:

The author employs a critical and comparative approach. He meticulously quotes or refers to various Vedic scriptures and Puranic stories, then analyzes them for logical consistency, historical plausibility, and philosophical depth, often drawing parallels or stark contrasts with Jain teachings. The author acknowledges the scholarly efforts of both Indian and Western academics in presenting these comparative insights.

Overall Tone:

While respectful of other traditions, the author's tone is critically analytical and firmly rooted in presenting Jainism as a complete and self-sufficient spiritual path. There's a clear intent to elevate Jain principles by highlighting what the author perceives as deficiencies or inconsistencies in other systems.

Significance:

"Tattvatrai Mimansa" appears to be a comprehensive and scholarly defense and exposition of Jain philosophy, aiming to clarify its unique position and refute what the author considers misinterpretations or dilutions of truth found in other religious traditions. The book is intended for personal and private use, suggesting a focus on deep study and understanding rather than proselytization.