Sanch Ko Aanch Nahi

Here's a comprehensive summary of the Jain text "Saanch Ko Aanch Nahi" by Bhushan Shah, based on the provided pages:

Title: Saanch Ko Aanch Nahi (Truth Fears No Harm)

Author: Bhushan Shah

Publisher: Chandroday Parivar

Overall Purpose: The booklet "Saanch Ko Aanch Nahi" is presented as a rebuttal and critical review of a book titled "Jaisi De Vaisi Mile, Kuye Ki Gunjhar" (As You Give, So You Receive, The Echo of the Well). The author, Bhushan Shah, aims to correct what he perceives as falsehoods, misrepresentations, and slanderous accusations made in "Kuye Ki Gunjhar" against Jain principles, particularly concerning idol worship (Murti Puja) and other traditions. The central theme is that truth, being inherent and immutable, will ultimately prevail and cannot be harmed.

Key Arguments and Themes:

• Defense of Truth (Saanch): The book is published with the belief that truth is unshakeable. It draws inspiration from Lord Mahavir's teachings, emphasizing the pursuit of truth through a neutral and investigative approach as outlined in the Acharanga Sutra.
• Critique of "Kuye Ki Gunjhar":
  • Ad Hominem and Abusive Language: "Kuye Ki Gunjhar" is criticized for its use of inappropriate and abusive language, which is deemed unbecoming of a learned person. The reviewer suggests that instead of resorting to insults, a learned individual would engage with arguments respectfully.
  • Lack of Scriptural Basis: The reviewer asserts that "Kuye Ki Gunjhar" makes claims against idol worship and other practices without providing any valid scriptural evidence from Jain Agamas. Instead, it allegedly fills the pages with irrelevant points and "mud-slinging."
  • Misrepresentation of History and Agamas: The book is accused of distorting historical facts and misinterpreting Agamic texts to support its anti-idol worship stance.
  • False Accusations Against Mahapurushas: "Kuye Ki Gunjhar" is blamed for falsely accusing and denigrating past revered Jain saints and their traditions, particularly regarding idol worship. This is presented as a grave sin.
• Defense of Idol Worship (Murti Puja):
  • Agamic and Historical Support: A significant portion of the booklet is dedicated to presenting extensive scriptural references (from Mahavira Sutra, Bhagavati Sutra, Upasaka Dasanga, Kalpa Sutra, Vyavahara Sutra, Prashna Vyakarana Sutra, Deepasagar Pannatti Sutra, etc.) and historical evidence to prove the ancient origins and validity of idol worship within Jainism.
  • Role of Idols: Idols are seen not just as inanimate objects but as representations that aid in spiritual contemplation, remembrance of Tirthankaras, and overall spiritual upliftment.
  • Scholarly Support: The reviewer cites numerous prominent Jain Acharyas and scholars who have supported idol worship, such as Acharya Yashovijayji, Vachak Shekhar Shri Umaswati, Bhadra Bahu Swami, Acharya Haribhadra Suri, Acharya Shantisuri, Shrimad Dharmadas Gani, Acharya Hemchandracharya, and Acharya Abhaydev Suri, highlighting their extensive works supporting the practice.
• Rejection of Anti-Idol Worship Arguments: The book systematically addresses and refutes specific arguments presented in "Kuye Ki Gunjhar," such as:
  • "Chetya" Word Interpretation: The reviewer argues that the word "Chetya" in Jain Agamas consistently refers to temples or idols and criticizes attempts to interpret it as "knowledge" or "monks" as a deliberate misrepresentation driven by prejudice.
  • "Shatavari" (Eternal) Argument: The notion that only eternal entities can be worshipped is refuted by explaining that Tirthankaras, though transient in their physical form, are eternal in their names and spiritual essence, and the worship of their representations is a way to connect with that eternal aspect.
  • Violence in Rituals: Arguments claiming violence in idol worship (e.g., using flowers, lamps) are countered by highlighting the greater potential for violence in the vast festivals and activities organized by the opposing sect.
  • "Loka Shah" and the "Revival": The historical role of Loka Shah and subsequent reform movements is critically examined. The book argues that the claims of Loka Shah reviving Jainism are based on fabricated history and that his actions, along with those of his successors, actually led to schisms and weakened the Jain tradition. The text questions the authenticity of historical accounts used by "Kuye Ki Gunjhar."
  • "Mukhawastrika" (Mouth Cloth) Usage: A substantial portion of the text is dedicated to analyzing the correct usage of the mouth cloth (Mukhawastrika) as prescribed in Jain scriptures. The reviewer argues forcefully that the tradition of tying the mouth cloth continuously for 24 hours is not supported by Agamas. Instead, scriptures indicate its use during specific times like speaking, transcribing, or cleaning oneself, to be held in the hand or placed in front of the mouth. The continuous tying is deemed impractical, a departure from true practice, and potentially a form of 'lingabhed' (disguise or incorrect outward appearance).
  • "22 Abhakshya" (Forbidden Foods): The arguments against the concept of 22 forbidden foods are addressed, with the reviewer asserting that traditions passed down through centuries, even if not explicitly detailed in every single Agama, hold validity, and that modern scientific interpretations do not negate these established practices.
  • "Prashechhep" (Interpolation/Addition) Allegations: The book repeatedly addresses accusations of interpolation in Jain scriptures. The reviewer argues that any perceived discrepancies are due to oral traditions, textual variations, or the compiler's effort to maintain continuity and comprehensiveness, not deliberate falsification. The practice of editing and compiling scriptures over centuries is explained as a natural process of preservation.
  • "Maha Nishith Sutra" Interpretation: The book aims to clarify the correct interpretation of the Maha Nishith Sutra, asserting that its warnings against certain practices were specific to the context of corrupt monks of that era and not a general prohibition against idol worship or temples.
  • Purity and Exceptions: The text discusses the principles of 'Utsarga' (general rule) and 'Apavada' (exception) in Jainism, suggesting that strict adherence to the general rule in all circumstances might not always be appropriate, especially in modern times, where certain exceptions might be necessary to uphold the core principles and prevent misinterpretations.
• Call for Neutrality and Truth Seeking: The reviewer appeals to readers, especially those from the opposing sect, to approach these matters with an open mind, free from prejudice and preconceived notions. The core message is to seek truth based on scriptural evidence and logical reasoning, rather than blindly following tradition or misinterpreting texts.
• Author's Stance: Bhushan Shah positions himself as a defender of established Jain traditions and historical accuracy, aiming to expose what he sees as the destructive and misleading agenda of the author of "Kuye Ki Gunjhar." He concludes with a plea for forgiveness ("Michchami Dukkaḍam") if any feelings were unintentionally hurt or if anything was written against the teachings of the Vitaragas (the Tirthankaras).

In essence, "Saanch Ko Aanch Nahi" is a detailed counter-argumentative work that seeks to defend the traditional Jain practices, particularly idol worship, and refute the criticisms leveled by the book "Kuye Ki Gunjhar" by presenting scriptural evidence, historical context, and logical reasoning.