Mahavir Vani Lecture 34 Yah Nishreyas Ka Marg Hai

Added to library: September 2, 2025

Loading image...
First page of Mahavir Vani Lecture 34 Yah Nishreyas Ka Marg Hai

Summary

Here's a comprehensive summary of Osho Rajnish's Lecture 34, "Mahavir Vani Lecture 34 Yah Nishreyas ka Marg Hai," based on the provided Jain text:

This lecture, titled "This is the Path of Nishreyas (Liberation)," is the seventh discourse in Osho's series on Mahavir Vani. It delves into the core principles of Jainism, particularly the path to liberation as envisioned by Lord Mahavir, contrasting it with devotional paths like that of Mira Bai.

The True Ascetic (Tyagi): Osho begins by defining a true renunciate. A genuine renunciate is someone who, despite having access to beautiful and desirable pleasures, turns away from them. Crucially, this renunciation must be from a position of freedom and capability, not due to any constraint or inability. Someone who cannot enjoy worldly things due to lack of means, subjugation, or weakness is not considered a true renunciate. The true renunciate chooses to forgo pleasures they could enjoy.

The Path to Nishreyas: The path to liberation (Nishreyas) is then outlined through several key practices:

  • Service to the Guru and the Experienced Elders: This emphasizes learning from those who have walked the spiritual path and possess genuine wisdom.
  • Avoiding the Company of Fools: This highlights the importance of associating with wise individuals and staying away from those who lack understanding or lead one astray.
  • Devoted Study and Contemplation of Scriptures: This involves diligently practicing the study of sacred texts and deeply meditating on their profound meanings.
  • Attaining Inner Peace (Dhriti): The ultimate goal of these practices is to achieve an unwavering peace of mind, a stable inner state.

The Question of Free Will vs. Determinism (Doing vs. Happening): A significant portion of the lecture addresses a fundamental philosophical dilemma:

  • Individual Responsibility vs. Cosmic Play: One listener's question highlights the apparent contradiction between Mahavir's emphasis on individual responsibility for every action ("you alone are responsible") and other philosophies that posit a predetermined universe where "not a leaf moves without God's will."
  • The Conflict of Paths: Osho argues that attempting to reconcile these two perspectives ("doing" and "happening") leads to trouble. The paths themselves are incompatible, even if the destinations might be the same. Trying to blend them creates confusion and prevents progress.

Mahavir's Path vs. Mira's Path: The Core of the Discussion: The lecture extensively contrasts Mahavir's approach with that of devotional mystics like Mira Bai.

  • Mira's Path (Surrender): Mira's path is characterized by surrender. She negates the "I" and merges with the "Thou" (God/Beloved). Her essence is "I am not, only You are." In this path, the self is completely annihilated, leading to a state of emptiness where even "You" loses meaning, as "You" derives its significance from the "I." This is labeled as the "feminine psyche" – receptive, surrendering, and dissolving.
  • Mahavir's Path (Resolve/Self-Effort): Mahavir's path is one of resolve and self-effort. He emphasizes forgetting the "Thou" and focusing solely on the "I." The individual takes complete responsibility for their actions and their consequences. Through self-purification and transformation, the "I" is refined to such an extent that it ultimately dissolves into nothingness, but not through surrender to another. This is the "masculine psyche" – focused on effort, self-reliance, and a peak-like endeavor.
  • The Destination is the Same, the Paths Differ: Both paths ultimately lead to the same ultimate state of liberation or "zero," but the starting points and the methods are diametrically opposed. Osho stresses that trying to blend these paths is detrimental.

Understanding the Individual's Position: Osho emphasizes that the choice of path depends on one's inherent nature and where they stand. He uses the metaphor of standing at different points on a mountain; the path taken will be different, but the summit is the same. One cannot impose their path on another, as this leads to violence and destruction. The truth itself is singular, but the paths to it are infinite and unique to each individual.

The Nature of True Renunciation (Revisited): Osho reiterates that true renunciation is an act of power and choice, not of helplessness. If one renounces out of inability or weakness, it is a delusion. Renunciation must be from a position of strength, where one could indulge but chooses not to. This chosen renunciation is what strengthens the individual.

The Danger of Intellectualizing and Seeking Compromise:

  • The Illusion of Knowledge: The lecture criticizes those who accumulate knowledge without genuine inner transformation. These "learned fools" are more dangerous than the unlearned. They create definitions and philosophies without true experience, leading to spiritual stagnation.
  • The Harm of Syncretism: Osho strongly advises against mixing spiritual paths or creating compromises. Such attempts dilute the purity of each path and lead to spiritual sterility, creating individuals who are neither here nor there.

The Role of Scriptures and the Guru:

  • Shatras (Scriptures): True scriptures (Shat-shastra) are those that lead to life transformation, not just intellectual theories or debates. They are guides for inner change.
  • Sadguru vs. Guru: A Sadguru is not just an informant but is the embodiment of the teachings themselves. Their lived experience is the ultimate authority, not just what is written in books. True service (seva) to a Sadguru is essential for inner transformation, as it fosters humility and allows the divine energy to flow into the disciple.

The Nature of the Self (I) and its Dissolution:

  • The Illusion of the "I": The core obstacle to liberation is the ego, the "I." This ego is a deep wound, often disguised by pleasant sensations (like praise) that make us cling to it even as it causes pain.
  • Two Paths to Dissolve the "I":
    1. Mahavir's Path: Intense self-purification and refinement of the "I" until it becomes so pure it dissolves into nothingness. This requires immense effort and discipline.
    2. Mira's Path: Complete surrender of the "I" at the feet of the divine. This seems easier but is equally difficult, as true surrender requires immense letting go.
  • Patience and Perseverance: Both paths require immense patience and inner peace. True spiritual progress is not a quick fix but a lifelong journey. The impatience of seeking immediate results (like "seeing God after two days of meditation") is a sign of deep-seated ingrained habits and ego.

The Unfolding Nature of Truth: Osho concludes by emphasizing that truth is simple, but our ingrained habits and ego make the journey difficult. The universe is vast and open, like the sky. God is not a person with doors but an open space. We are the ones who close our doors through our assumptions and ego. The key is to let go of the "I," whether through self-effort or surrender, and to be open to the vastness that is already present. The lecture ends with a call for kirtan (devotional singing).