Jaina Ontology

Added to library: September 2, 2025

Loading image...
First page of Jaina Ontology

Summary

Here's a comprehensive summary of K. K. Dixit's "Jaina Ontology," based on the provided text:

Book Title: Jaina Ontology Author: Dr. K. K. Dixit Publisher: L. D. Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad Series: Lalbhai Dalpatbhai Series, No. 31 Publication Year: 1971

Overview: "Jaina Ontology" by Dr. K. K. Dixit is a historical and analytical study of the development of Jaina philosophical concepts, particularly in the realm of ontology, but also touching upon epistemology. The work aims to trace the evolution of these ideas from the earliest Āgamic texts up to the 17th-18th centuries CE, considering the contributions of both Śvetāmbara and Digambara traditions. Dixit emphasizes the need for a historical perspective to understand Jaina thought, arguing against the misconception that it has remained static.

Key Themes and Chronological Framework:

Dixit divides the history of Jaina philosophical speculation into two major periods:

  1. The Age of Āgamas (Pre-Christian Centuries to 6th Century CE):

    • General Characteristics: This age is characterized by the foundational scriptural texts known as Āgamas. The development of thought here is less systematic, often presented in dialogues or simple assertions.
    • Three Stages:
      • First Stage (5th-2nd Centuries BCE): Primarily represented by the older parts of the Bhagavatī Sūtra and philosophical sections of Ācārāṅga Sūtra, Sūtra kṛtānga Sūtra, and Dašavaikalika Sūtra. These texts exhibit less systematicity, more direct assertions, and often appeal to authority or use analogies. Key topics discussed include cosmography (loka-aloka), the nature of pañcāstikāyas, pudgala, jīva, and early karma doctrine. The conceptualization of loka-aloka and pañcāstikāyas evolved, with early discussions showing a defensive tone regarding invisible entities like dharma, adharma, and ākāśa. The jīva is understood in relation to its diverse physical forms, and the early karma doctrine views bad acts as "touching" the soul.
      • Second Stage (2nd Century BCE to 1st Century CE): Marked by Prajñāpana Sūtra and other minor texts. This stage shows an advance in systematicity. Prajñāpana attempts a more structured treatment of topics, focusing heavily on the life activities of living beings, particularly the soul (jīva). While Prajñāpana contains extensive discussions on jīva, its treatment of loka-aloka, pañcāstikāya, and pudgala is less independent. New methodological tendencies emerge, like the gradual evolution of anuyogadvāra lists (mārgaṇāsthānas, jīvasthānas, guṇasthānas), showing a progression from less systematic to more organized enumerations. The karma doctrine here is more systematic than in the first stage but still elementary compared to later works.
      • Third Stage (1st-6th Centuries CE): Characterized by texts like Anuyogadvāra Sūtra, Nandi Sūtra, Āvašyaka Niryukti, Satkhaṇḍāgama, and Tattvārtha Sūtra (with bhāṣya). This stage sees the development of key methodological tools such as anuyogadvāras (points of investigation), nikṣepas (categories of analysis), nayus (expressions of partial truths), and a more massive working out of the karma doctrine. Tattvārtha Sūtra, by Umāsvāti, is seen as a summary of Āgamic positions, introducing precise formulations of mokṣamārga, samyagdarsana, and saptatattva. The problems of anuyogadvāra, naya, and nikṣepa are new to this age, while the problem of jñāna evolves into the problem of pramāṇa. Satkhaṇḍāgama is highlighted for its detailed karma doctrine and its systematic employment of concepts like mārgaṇāsthānas and guṇasthānas.
  2. The Age of Logic (5th Century CE onwards):

    • General Characteristics: This age is defined by a freer use of logical faculties, explicit naming and criticism of rival philosophical views, and assertions always supported by arguments.
    • Three Stages:
      • First Stage (5th-7th Centuries CE): Early representatives include Śvetāmbara authors like Siddhasena (semi-Āgamic), Mallavādi (purely logical), and Jinabhadra (semi-Āgamic), and Digambara authors like Kundakunda (semi-Āgamic) and Samantabhadra (purely logical). This stage witnesses the refinement of the naya doctrine (especially the dravyāstika-paryāyāstika division), the initial formulation of Saptabhangi, and a preliminary evaluation of non-Jaina philosophies. Kundakunda's distinctive emphasis on the niscaya versus vyavahāra standpoint is noted. Samantabhadra's Āptamīmāṁsā is crucial for its systematic application of Saptabhangi and its formulation of Anekāntavāda.
      • Second Stage (7th-9th Centuries CE): Dominated by Haribhadra (Śvetāmbara) and Akalanka and Vidyānanda (Digambara). This stage sees a more advanced critique of rival systems and the development of a distinct Jaina doctrine of pramāņas, with Akalanka being a pioneer in this regard. Vidyānanda's works are considered the culmination of this stage, marked by thorough analysis and integration of Akalanka's legacy.
      • Third Stage (Post-9th Century CE): Features Prabhācandra (Digambara), and Abhayadeva, Vadideva, and Yašovijaya (Śvetāmbara). This stage is characterized by a synthesis of traditional Jaina thought with contemporary philosophical developments, particularly Navya-Nyāya and Advaita Vedānta. Yašovijaya is recognized as the last great philosopher of this age, synthesizing old and new ideas with remarkable clarity.

Key Doctrinal Developments:

  • Ontological Categories: The core of Jaina ontology, as discussed, revolves around the five astikāyas (soul, matter, medium of motion, medium of stoppage, space) and time (kāla). The evolution of the concept of pudgala (matter) and its atomic composition is traced. The understanding of reality (sat) as characterized by origination, destruction, and permanence is identified as a later development.
  • Anekāntavāda (Non-absolutism): Presented as the most characteristic Jaina philosophical view of the Age of Logic. Its logic is explained as the thesis that everything is characterized by mutually contradictory properties under specific conditions. Its application to problems like change and permanence, similarity and dissimilarity, identity and difference, and cause and effect is detailed.
  • Pramāṇa (Instruments of Valid Cognition): The evolution from the traditional five jñānas to the Age of Logic's concept of pramāṇas (like perception, memory, recognition, inference, scripture) is analyzed, with Akalanka's six pramāṇas being a significant development.
  • Naya (Expressions of Partial Truth): The doctrine of seven nayas (and their later subdivisions) is traced, highlighting its development as a tool for understanding multiple perspectives and its connection to Anekāntavāda.
  • Nikṣepa (Categories of Analysis): The evolution of the four nikṣepas (nāma, sthāpanā, dravya, bhāva) is discussed as a methodological tool.
  • Saptabhangi (Sevenfold Predication): The doctrine, which posits seven alternative propositions to describe a thing, is traced from its earliest appearances to its more systematic formulations, playing a crucial role in the vindication of Anekāntavāda.
  • Karma Doctrine: Its development from simple concepts in the Age of Āgamas to complex, systematized theories in later texts, particularly focusing on karma-bandha and karma-vedana, is outlined.
  • Critique of Non-Jaina Philosophies: A significant aspect of the Age of Logic is the detailed examination and critique of Buddhist, Sankhya, Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika, Mimāṁsā, and Vedānta schools from a Jaina perspective.

Methodology and Contributions:

  • Dixit employs a comparative and historical method, analyzing texts from both Śvetāmbara and Digambara traditions.
  • He identifies key texts and authors who contributed to the evolution of Jaina ontology and epistemology, highlighting their specific innovations and the chronological development of concepts.
  • The work underscores the importance of understanding Jaina philosophy not as a static dogma but as a dynamic intellectual tradition that engaged with contemporary philosophical debates.

Overall Significance: "Jaina Ontology" provides a systematic and scholarly account of the historical development of Jaina philosophical thought. It is particularly valuable for its clear delineation of chronological stages, its analysis of key texts and authors, and its detailed exploration of core Jaina doctrines like Anekāntavāda, pramāṇa, naya, and nikṣepa within their historical context. The book is essential for students of Jainology and Indian philosophy seeking a deep understanding of the intricate philosophical landscape of Jainism.