Gyanvad Ek Parishilan

Added to library: September 1, 2025

Loading image...
First page of Gyanvad Ek Parishilan

Summary

Here's a comprehensive summary of the Jain text "Gyanvad Ek Parishilan" by Devendramuni Shastri, based on the provided PDF content:

Title: Gyanvad Ek Parishilan (An Examination of the Doctrine of Knowledge) Author: Devendramuni Shastri Publisher: Z_Anandrushi_Abhinandan_Granth_012013.pdf

This text is a detailed exploration of the Jain philosophy of knowledge, its nature, its relationship with the soul, its types, and its development within Jain scriptures.

Key Themes and Concepts:

  1. Soul and Knowledge (Gyan aur Atma ka Sambandh):

    • Inherent Nature: Jainism asserts that knowledge (Gyan) is an intrinsic and natural quality of the soul (Atma). It's not an acquired or external attribute, unlike the relationship between a stick and its holder.
    • Indivisible Relationship: Knowledge is inseparable from the soul. The soul cannot be conceived without knowledge, and vice versa. They have a relationship of identity (tadatmyam).
    • Nischaya Naya vs. Vyavahar Naya: From the ultimate perspective (Nischaya Naya), the soul and knowledge are one. From a practical or conventional perspective (Vyavahar Naya), knowledge is seen as a quality of the soul.
    • Self-Illuminating Nature: Knowledge is inherently self-illuminating and also illuminates external objects. Just as a lamp illuminates itself and other objects, knowledge knows itself and others.
  2. Origin of Knowledge (Gyan Utpanna Kaise Hota Hai):

    • Not from Objects: Knowledge does not originate from the objects of knowledge (Gneya), nor does an object come into existence because of knowledge. Objects exist independently.
    • Manifestation of Capacity: When we encounter an object, knowledge is not produced but rather manifested or used. The soul possesses the inherent capacity to know.
    • Role of Sensories and Mind: When the soul's knowledge is covered (avrita), instruments like senses (indriyas) and the mind (mana) act as intermediaries. They facilitate the soul's interaction with objects, leading to the manifestation of knowledge.
    • Tendency, Not Origin: The process of knowledge is a manifestation or tendency (pravritti), not an origin (utpatti). The extent to which one can know depends on the soul's inherent capacity.
  3. Relationship between Knowledge and the Known (Gyan aur Gneya ka Sambandh):

    • Subject-Object Relationship: The relationship is one of subject (the knower, i.e., the soul/knowledge) and object (the known, i.e., the substance, its qualities, and states).
    • Interdependence of Capacity: Both the knower and the known are independent, yet they possess the inherent capacity to be known and to know, respectively. This mutual capacity is the basis for their partial non-difference.
  4. Types of Knowledge (Gyan ke Prakar) and the Stages of Discussion:

    • Five Types of Knowledge (Pancha Gyan): Jainism categorizes knowledge into five types:
      1. Abhinibodhika Gyan (Mati Gyan): Sensory and mental knowledge.
      2. Shrut Gyan: Knowledge derived from scriptures or auditory perception of meaning.
      3. Avadhi Gyan: Clairvoyant knowledge of subtle, distant, and past/future material objects within limits.
      4. Manahparyaya Gyan: Telepathic knowledge of the thoughts of others' minds.
      5. Keval Gyan: Omniscience, complete and absolute knowledge.
    • Developmental Stages of Discussion: The text outlines three phases in the discourse on knowledge in Jain Agamas:
      • First Stage: Focuses on the five types of knowledge, with subdivisions of Mati Gyan into Avagrah, Iha, Avay, and Dharana.
      • Second Stage: Divides knowledge into two main categories: Indriya-janya (sensory) and Anindriya-janya (mental/non-sensory). Mati and Shrut Gyan are classified as indirect (paroksha), while Avadhi, Manahparyaya, and Keval Gyan are direct (pratyaksha). Jainism considers only soul-dependent knowledge as true direct knowledge.
      • Third Stage: Introduces a further refinement, classifying Mati Gyan (sensory knowledge) into direct and indirect. It acknowledges sensory knowledge as "conventional direct" (samvyavaharika pratyaksha) due to worldly acceptance, while true direct knowledge (paramarthika pratyaksha) is solely soul-dependent (Avadhi, Manahparyaya, Keval).
  5. Mati Gyan (Sensory and Mental Knowledge):

    • Process: Involves the interaction of senses and mind with objects.
    • Sub-types: The four stages of perception are:
      • Avagrah: Initial, general perception of an object. It has two types:
        • Vyanjan Avagrah: The initial, indistinct perception of sensory data, considered primitive and associated with touch, taste, smell, and hearing. It's seen as not directly occurring for sight and mind.
        • Arth Avagrah: The more distinct perception of the object's essence or general nature.
      • Iha: Conjecture or inquiry about the object, seeking specifics. It involves deliberation and inclination towards a particular aspect, unlike doubt (samshay) which is balanced between possibilities.
      • Avay: Determination or ascertainment of the object. It involves the resolution of doubt and the identification of specific qualities.
      • Dharana: Retention or memory of the ascertained knowledge, leaving an impression (samskar) on the soul, which can lead to recollection later.
    • Sensory Capacities: The text details the varying strengths of senses, with sight (Chakshu) being the strongest, followed by hearing (Shrotra), and then touch, taste, and smell (Sparshan, Rasana, Ghran).
  6. Shrut Gyan (Scriptural/Auditory Knowledge):

    • Nature: Knowledge derived from auditory perception of meaning, scriptures, or authoritative teachings. It requires a cause (Mati Gyan) and the proper disposition of the auditory knowledge-obscuring karma.
    • Two Types:
      • Anga-pravishṭa: Knowledge directly revealed by Tirthankaras and codified by Ganadharas (the twelve Angas).
      • Anga-bahya: Texts and knowledge compiled by later Acharyas based on the Angas.
    • Relationship with Mati Gyan: Mati Gyan is the cause, and Shrut Gyan is the effect. Shrut Gyan is always verbal or related to meaning conveyed by words.
  7. Avadhi Gyan (Clairvoyant Knowledge):

    • Nature: Limited direct knowledge of material objects, covering aspects of substance, space, time, and state. It cannot know non-material substances.
    • Source: Occurs in all four types of beings (hell dwellers, animals, humans, and gods).
    • Types:
      • Bhava-pratyaya: Innate knowledge present from birth (in gods and hell-dwellers).
      • Guna-pratyaya: Acquired knowledge through spiritual discipline and vows (in humans and animals).
    • Sub-types (based on continuity and intensity): Anugami (continues with the soul), Ananugami (does not), Vardhmana (increases), Hiyaman (decreases), Pratipati (disappears), Apratipaati (remains).
    • Sub-types (based on scope): Deśa-avadhi (limited spatial scope), Param-avadhi (extended spatial scope), Sarva-avadhi (all material reality).
  8. Manahparyaya Gyan (Telepathic Knowledge):

    • Nature: Knowledge of the thoughts of others' minds. It pertains to the mental modifications of sentient beings.
    • Scope: Limited to human beings with proper conduct. It directly cognizes the mental modifications of others.
    • Source: It's a form of direct knowledge, but limited in scope.
    • Types:
      • Rijumati: Less pure, pertains to the immediate thoughts.
      • Vipulamati: More pure, can know subtle mental states and persists longer.
    • Controversy: There's a debate on whether it directly perceives the object of thought or the mental modification itself. The latter view is considered more logical.
  9. Keval Gyan (Omniscience):

    • Nature: Absolute, complete, and unimpeded knowledge of all substances and their states, past, present, and future, in both material and non-material realms. It is pure, unadulterated, and eternal.
    • Completion of Knowledge: It represents the full blossoming of the soul's inherent knowledge capacity, achieved by the complete eradication of knowledge-obscuring karma.
  10. Darshan (Perception) vs. Gyan (Knowledge):

    • Distinction: Jainism differentiates between Darshan (perception) and Gyan (knowledge). Darshan is considered nirvikalpaka (without conceptualization, general perception) and Gyan is savikalpaka (with conceptualization, specific knowledge).
    • Karma: Darshan is veiled by Darshanavaraniya karma, and Gyan by Jnanavaraniya karma.
    • Causality and Co-occurrence: The relationship between Darshan and Gyan, especially in the case of Kevalis, is a subject of debate:
      • Sequential: Some believe Darshan and Gyan occur sequentially (e.g., in the case of worldly souls).
      • Simultaneous (Yugapad): Many Digambara and some Shvetambara scholars believe that for the Kevali, Darshan and Gyan occur simultaneously.
      • Identity: Some scholars propose they are ultimately not different but one.
    • Interpretations: The difference between general and specific perception is often explained as the focus of the upayoga (activity of the soul). Some view Darshan as apprehending the general essence and Gyan as apprehending specifics. However, at the ultimate level, this distinction merges.

The text concludes by emphasizing the profound and systematic analysis of knowledge within Jain philosophy, highlighting its development through different textual stages and the logical arguments presented by various Acharyas to explain its nuances. It underscores the intrinsic nature of knowledge as an attribute of the soul and its various manifestations.