Dharmna Tattvagyanna Vyakhyano
Added to library: September 1, 2025

Summary
Here is a comprehensive summary of the provided Jain text, "Dharmna Tattvagyanna Vyakhyano" (Discourses on the Philosophy of Religion), specifically the first discourse titled "Ishwar Chhe Teni Shi Khatri?" (What is the assurance that God exists?):
Overall Purpose and Context:
This text, authored by Reverend W. Graham Mulligan and published by Krushnalal Mohanlal Zaveri, is the first in a series of discourses aiming to address the growing irreligion and materialism prevalent among the youth. The author, a Christian missionary, tackles the fundamental question of God's existence from various philosophical, scientific, and introspective viewpoints. The work is presented with an introduction by Krushnalal Mohanlal Zaveri, who highlights the contemporary relevance of the topic, especially in the face of rising atheism and materialism.
Structure of the First Discourse:
The first discourse is divided into three main sections:
- Nastik ni Vani (The Atheist's Argument): This section presents the arguments put forth by atheists and materialists to deny the existence of God.
- Aastik ni Vani (The Theist's Argument): This section offers counter-arguments and positive evidence for the existence of God from a theistic perspective.
- Prakatikaran ni Vani (The Argument from Revelation): This section focuses on the Christian concept of revelation, specifically through the Bible, as a source of knowledge about God.
Key Arguments and Themes:
1. The Atheist's Argument:
- Materialism and its Influence: The discourse acknowledges the pervasive influence of materialism, which posits that only matter is real and that phenomena can be explained solely through physical laws. This leads to doubt about the existence of an incorporeal God.
- Scientific Discoveries and Their Misinterpretation: Atheists often cite scientific discoveries, such as the theory of evolution, as evidence against God. The text notes the early belief that humans evolved from apes, which caused many to lose faith. However, it also points out that later scientific findings have led to contradictions in such simplistic interpretations.
- Anthropological and Psychological Explanations: Atheists also argue that the concept of God originated from human superstition, fear, and the desire for a protector. They suggest that early humans attributed spiritual qualities to natural phenomena (animism) and later developed anthropomorphic deities, which then evolved into the abstract concept of God.
- Self-Interest and Religious Institutions: The argument is made that religious leaders and institutions perpetuate faith for personal gain and to maintain social order, with rulers using religion to legitimize their authority.
- Psychological Origins of God-Belief: Modern psychology is cited to argue that the concept of God stems from the child's dependence on parents and the unconscious projection of parental authority and care onto a supreme being. Similarly, human desires and wishes are seen as contributing to the formation of the God-concept.
- The "Uncaused Cause" Problem: Atheists sometimes grapple with the "uncaused cause" principle, suggesting that if everything has a cause, then the universe must be eternal and self-existent, eliminating the need for a creator. They may also point to the atom as the fundamental, eternal building block of reality.
2. The Theist's Argument:
- Intuitive Knowledge and Personal Experience: Theists argue that the very fact of our own existence, and our ability to perceive and interact with others, is based on faith and trust rather than absolute empirical proof. Similarly, the author personally experiences God's presence, hears God speaking to his soul, and finds strength and help in prayer.
- The Argument from Reason and Order: The universe exhibits remarkable order, regularity, and adherence to laws (e.g., 2+2=4, scientific laws). This suggests an inherent intelligence and mind behind the cosmos. If the universe operates according to rational principles, it implies a rational intelligence as its source.
- The Argument from Consciousness: The existence of consciousness, and the fact that consciousness expands with understanding (from an ant to a human), points towards a Supreme Consciousness that encompasses all existence.
- The Argument from Causality: Every effect has a cause. While science explains the chain of cause and effect within the material world, the question of the first cause remains. Theists argue that the ultimate cause must be self-existent and different from the caused phenomena, leading to the concept of God. The idea of an eternal, uncaused atom is also challenged as requiring as much faith as the belief in God.
- The Argument from Morality and Conscience: Humans possess a moral sense and conscience, which distinguishes right from wrong. This innate moral awareness suggests a moral lawgiver and judge. The author emphasizes that conscience is not self-generated but speaks with authority from an external source, pointing to God.
- The Argument from Desire and Love: Humans have desires and capabilities that extend beyond the material world, such as the appreciation of beauty, truth, and goodness. These abstract concepts, which are often imperfect in experience, point to a perfect, infinite source of these qualities – God. The author argues that our capacity to love originates from God's prior love for us.
- The Collective Evidence of Humanity: The widespread and persistent belief in God across cultures and throughout history is presented as evidence of a universal human intuition of God's existence.
3. The Argument from Revelation (Christian Perspective):
- Humanity's Creation in God's Image: The Bible teaches that humans were created in God's image, possessing intellect, emotion, and will, albeit limited compared to God's infinite attributes.
- The Origin of Sin: While created good, human free will led to a misuse of these gifts, resulting in sin and a departure from God's will.
- God's Love and Revelation through Jesus Christ: God, in His infinite love, revealed Himself to humanity through Jesus Christ. Jesus, being a divine incarnation, lived a sinless life and atoned for humanity's sins through his crucifixion.
- Jesus's Life and Message: The text highlights Jesus's sinless life, his teachings of love and forgiveness, and his invitation to those who are weary to find rest in Him, as central to the Christian understanding of God's revelation.
Critique of Atheistic Arguments:
Throughout the "Aastik ni Vani" section, the author systematically refutes the atheistic arguments presented earlier. He contends that:
- Scientific discoveries do not negate God's existence but rather reveal the intricate design of the universe, which points to a Creator.
- The evolutionary argument has been challenged by scientific evidence itself.
- While human understanding of God has evolved, this evolution does not invalidate the concept of God but rather reflects humanity's growing comprehension.
- Psychological and anthropological explanations for the origin of religion fail to account for the intrinsic nature of morality and the human longing for the divine.
- The argument that religion is solely driven by self-interest overlooks the genuine spiritual experiences and motivations of many.
Conclusion of the First Discourse:
The discourse concludes by emphasizing that while no single argument definitively proves God's existence, the cumulative evidence from reason, conscience, experience, and the innate human longing for something beyond the material provides a strong foundation for theistic belief. The author asserts that science has its limits and cannot definitively disprove God, and that understanding God requires a form of knowledge beyond empirical observation – knowledge gained through personal encounter and divine revelation.
Overall Message:
The book aims to guide individuals, particularly the youth, away from atheism and materialism by presenting a reasoned defense of religious belief, with a focus on Christian theology as presented by the author. It encourages a thoughtful consideration of faith, acknowledging the challenges posed by modern thought while upholding the enduring truths of religion.